Greenbelt, Maryland – A prison criticism has been filed charging Rudolph Brooks, Jr., age 45, of Cheltenham, Maryland, on the federal cost of wire fraud.  As well as, legislation enforcement obtained warrants authorizing the seizure of greater than $2.2 million held in numerous financial institution accounts, in addition to a 2018 Tesla Mannequin 3.  The prison criticism was filed on March 29, 2021 and was unsealed following Brooks’s arrest on April 2, 2021.

The prison criticism and seizures had been introduced by Performing United States Legal professional for the District of Maryland Jonathan F. Lenzner; Particular Agent in Cost Shimon R. Richmond of the Federal Deposit Insurance coverage Company, Workplace of Inspector Common (FDIC OIG); Performing Particular Agent in Cost Darrell Waldon of the Inner Income Service – Prison Investigation (IRS-CI), Washington, D.C. Discipline Workplace; Particular Agent in Cost Jennifer C. Boone of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Baltimore Discipline Workplace; and Inspector Common Hannibal “Mike” Ware of the U.S. Small Enterprise Administration Workplace of Inspector Common (SBA OIG).

As detailed within the affidavit filed in assist of the prison criticism, the Coronavirus Help, Aid, and Financial Safety (“CARES”) Act is a federal legislation enacted in March 2020 to offer emergency monetary help to the hundreds of thousands of Individuals affected by the financial penalties of COVID-19.  The CARES Act approved as much as $659 billion in forgivable loans to small companies for worker retention and sure enterprise bills by the Paycheck Safety Program (“PPP”).  The enterprise should use PPP mortgage proceeds on payroll prices, mortgage curiosity, hire, and utilities.  Initially, this system allowed the principal to be forgiven if the enterprise spent the mortgage proceeds on qualifying bills inside eight weeks of mortgage issuance and used at the least 75 p.c of the mortgage for payroll.  On June 5, 2020, the Paycheck Safety Program Flexibility Act of 2020 went into impact.  This legislation prolonged the interval from eight weeks to 24 weeks that the mortgage proceeds needed to be spent and decreased the requirement that the mortgage proceeds be spent on payroll from 75 p.c to 60 p.c.  An Financial Damage Catastrophe Mortgage (“EIDL”) is an SBA-administered mortgage designed to offer help to small companies that endure substantial financial harm because of a declared catastrophe.  An EIDL helps companies meet needed monetary obligations that would have been met had the catastrophe not occurred.  It supplies reduction from financial harm that the catastrophe triggered and permits companies to take care of an affordable working capital place through the interval that the catastrophe affected.  In March 2020, the SBA issued an EIDL declaration making EIDL loans accessible to small companies to assist alleviate financial harm attributable to COVID-19.

Brooks is the proprietor of Vehicles Direct by Gavawn HWD Bob’s Motors (Vehicles Direct), the said objective of which was to buy and promote vehicles.   Vehicles Direct was integrated with the Maryland State Division of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT) on October 29, 2010.  Vehicles Direct was forfeited on October 1, 2012 and subsequently revived on Might 28, 2020.  Brooks is listed because the resident agent with SDAT. 

The affidavit alleges that, on Might 9, 2020, Brooks utilized for a PPP mortgage on behalf of Vehicles Direct within the quantity of $1,556,589.  In assist of the Vehicles Direct PPP mortgage utility, Brooks allegedly submitted fraudulent tax kinds which allegedly reported $724,469 in funds by way of Varieties 1099-MISC and $7,471,630 in complete unemployment funds to staff from Vehicles Direct.  Nonetheless, as detailed within the affidavit, IRS data don’t replicate any tax filings made by Vehicles Direct for any tax interval, indicating that Vehicles Direct has not employed staff or paid unemployment taxes.  Moreover, the Maryland Division of Labor has no report of Vehicles Direct paying wages or of Brooks receiving wages.

On April 7, 2020, Brooks allegedly submitted an EIDL mortgage utility on behalf of Vehicles Direct that contradicted the data and supporting documentation Brooks submitted for Vehicles Directs’ PPP mortgage utility.  The EIDL utility on behalf of Vehicles Direct allegedly said that the corporate’s gross income was $148,000 and price of products bought was $82,293 within the one 12 months interval previous to COVID-19 being declared a catastrophe, which is inconsistent with a enterprise that may assist common month-to-month payroll prices of $622,635 or annual funds of $7,471,630 as Brooks reported on the PPP mortgage utility and supporting fraudulent tax paperwork.

On Might 9, 2020, Vehicles Directs’ PPP mortgage was accredited and $1,556,589 was subsequently deposited right into a checking account which has Brooks listed as the only signer on the account.  Previous to the deposit of the PPP mortgage funds, payroll funds or payroll taxes had been absent from this account. In accordance with the affidavit, Brooks allegedly opened one other checking account within the title of Payroll by BJM, into which he transferred $500,000 of PPP mortgage funds.  Brooks additionally then registered Payroll by BJM with SDAT, itemizing himself as resident agent.  Though the title Payroll by BJM creates the looks that the account is related to a payroll firm, there was no payroll or payroll-related bills paid from this account.  Brooks additionally opened extra accounts within the title of Vehicles Direct, into which he transferred PPP mortgage funds.

After the deposit of PPP mortgage funds, Brooks initiated quite a few transfers of PPP mortgage funds from the Vehicles Direct accounts to his private financial institution accounts. Data revealed that Brooks used the PPP mortgage funds for private expenditures together with bank card payments, purchases at eating places, retail shops, grocery shops, and automotive auctioneers, and mortgage funds for Brooks Cheltenham residence.

Starting Might 22, 2020, Brooks used PPP mortgage funds from the Vehicles Direct account and his personal private account to buy of 39 used vehicles (together with a 2017 Mercedes Benz S Class, two 2017 Infinity Q50s, a 2015 Cadillac Escalade, a 2005 Bentley Continental, a 2018 Tesla Mannequin 3, a 2014 GMC Yukon XL, and several other older mannequin luxurious automobiles. Below the phrases of the PPP mortgage program, the acquisition of those automobiles isn’t an applicable use of mortgage funds.

In accordance with the affidavit, on July 30, 2020, Brooks initiated a wire switch from his private account to Tesla Motors for $60,407, which was used to buy a 2018 Tesla Mannequin 3. “Rudolph Brooks” was listed because the buyer for this car, and a District of Columbia driver’s license was on file for an in depth relative of Brooks.  Data from the State of Maryland replicate that the Tesla Mannequin 3 was registered in Brooks’s title at Brooks’s Cheltenham residence.

Lastly, on August 13, 2020, Brooks initiated two wire transfers from one of many Vehicles Direct accounts for $144,343 and $2165 to a title firm relating to a property in Baltimore, Maryland.  On the time of the wire transfers, $133,669.54 in funds from the Vehicles Direct PPP mortgage remained within the Vehicles Direct account.  Actual property deeds filed with the State of Maryland present that the Baltimore property was bought by Madaro, LLC (Madaro) for $148,500.  Madaro was registered with the District of Columbia on August 8, 2019 and Brooks was listed because the resident agent of the corporate.  Brooks executed an Public sale Contract of Sale on June 18, 2020 to buy the Baltimore property.

As well as, seizure warrants approved the seizure of as much as $2,296,136.86 from eleven financial institution accounts and the 2018 Tesla Mannequin 3 described above.  The affidavit in assist of the seizure warrants alleges that these funds and car represent or are derived from the proceeds traceable to false statements made on financial institution mortgage purposes. 

If convicted, Brooks faces a most sentence of 20 years in federal jail for wire fraud adopted by three years of supervised launch.  Precise sentences for federal crimes are usually lower than the utmost penalties.  A federal district court docket decide will decide any sentence after taking into consideration the U.S. Sentencing Tips and different statutory components.

A prison criticism isn’t a discovering of guilt.  A person charged by prison criticism is presumed harmless until and till confirmed responsible at some later prison proceedings. 

Performing United States Legal professional Jonathan F. Lenzner recommended the FDIC OIG, the IRS-CI, the FBI, and the SBA OIG for his or her work within the investigation.  Mr. Lenzner thanked Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sean R. Delaney and Jessica Collins, who’re prosecuting the case.

# # #